
The scanning electron micrograph (left), shows an area about 1 mm across. The small outlined area is enlarged on the right
The mud has broken so that a rounded sand grain is exposed at the top left. In the centre is the concave space that was occupied by a sand grain that has pulled out. Notice that the clay does not entirely fill the spaces between the grains. This is important both for stability and for good buffering. If many of the sand grains are touching, the mud cannot shrink. Instead, the clay cracks into microscopic fissures, which give it a large accessible surface.
The correct mixing of sand and clay to give a slightly porous structure, with sand grains touching, will give the best moisture buffering and also the best building quality.
Cellular concrete has a rather different structure.

The picture on the left is a broken surface, 2 mm across. The gas bubbles are mostly far apart, with only occasional interconnections. The bulk of the structure is a mass of fibrous calcium aluminosilicate fibres, together with some etched quartz grains. The pictures to the right zoom in on the structure.
The large, isolated voids in cellular concrete give it good thermal insulation but harm its buffer properties. The volume in the voids contributes no moisture capacity and the voids are not so extensively interlinked that they provide an easy diffusion path for moisture from the interior to reach the surface.
The next chapter compares the performance of several porous building materials as relative humidity buffers.
Thanks to Ulrich Schnell of the National Museum's Conservation Department, and to The Conservation School in Copenhagen, for the micrographs.
Gernot Minke, 'Materialkennwerte von Lehmbaustoffen', Bauphysik 17 (1995) 124-130.